TMS (transcranial magnetic stimulation) is slower but often covered by insurance. It means daily sessions over four to six weeks, with effects that build gradually and no drug in your system. Ketamine works faster, often within days, but infusions are typically cash-pay, involve dissociative effects and monitoring, and many people need ongoing maintenance. If you're acutely struggling, speed argues for ketamine. If budget and coverage drive the decision, TMS often wins. Most people are somewhere in between, and that is what the rest of this article is for.
| What differs | TMS | IV ketamine |
|---|---|---|
| FDA status | FDA-cleared since 2008 | Off-label for depression |
| How it's given | Magnetic coil against the scalp. You're awake. | IV infusion with monitoring |
| Session length | About 20 to 40 minutes. Newer protocols take a few minutes. | About 40 minutes, plus recovery |
| Starting schedule | 5 sessions a week for 4 to 6 weeks | About 6 infusions over 2 to 3 weeks |
| Insurance | Often covered after documented antidepressant failures | Almost always out of pocket. Spravato® is often covered with prior authorization. |
| How fast it can work | Builds gradually over weeks | Often within days for people who respond |
| Driving | You can drive yourself home | Not for 24 hours |
| Main side effects | Scalp discomfort and headache. Seizure is rare. | Dissociation and blood-pressure effects |
| After the first course | In one manufacturer-sponsored registry, about 6 in 10 responders were still responding a year later, while on antidepressants; about a third of patients had TMS repeated | Benefit fades for many people. Booster timing varies. |
What TMS involves
TMS uses a magnetic coil against the scalp near the left prefrontal cortex, an area of the brain thought to be involved in mood regulation. It's been FDA-cleared since 2008, and many insurers cover it for major depression after documented antidepressant failures; how many failures varies by plan. A standard course is five sessions a week for four to six weeks, roughly 20 to 40 minutes each, sometimes followed by a short taper. Newer protocols (intermittent theta burst) cut sessions to a few minutes, and some centers run condensed schedules. You're awake, you drive yourself home, and the common side effects are scalp discomfort and headache early in the course. Seizure, the serious risk, is rare: a survey of over half a million treatment sessions found about 0.7 seizures per 1,000 patients treated, with a higher rate reported for one deep-TMS coil type than for standard figure-8 coils.
The catch is the calendar. Twenty to thirty appointments over four to six weeks is a real commitment for anyone working or caregiving, and improvement typically emerges gradually over the middle weeks of the course. That is hard when you're barely holding on now.
Where each one is stronger
- Speed: ketamine, clearly. Responders often feel a shift within the first few sessions, sometimes the first. TMS builds over weeks. For someone in acute distress, that difference can settle the question. (In a crisis, neither is the answer. See below.)
- Insurance: TMS, more often than ketamine. Spravato® sits in the middle, often covered with prior authorization and closely related to ketamine. IV ketamine is almost always out of pocket; a full course with a year of maintenance can run five figures. Our cost page has the math. For plan rules, see will my insurance cover Spravato®?
- Response rates: hard to compare directly. In one naturalistic study of 307 patients at 42 U.S. TMS practices, sponsored by the device's manufacturer, 58% responded and 37% reached remission by clinician rating (41–56% and 27–29% on patient questionnaires). Real-world ketamine figures fall in a broadly similar range (detailed here). But the studies use different scales, patients, and time points, and head-to-head trials are scarce. A 2025 exploratory analysis matching patients from one large TMS trial and one esketamine trial suggested TMS was at least as effective over four weeks. Claims that one "beats" the other outrun the evidence.
- Durability: in a 12-month follow-up of a manufacturer-sponsored U.S. registry, about 6 in 10 people who responded to a TMS course were still responding a year later while staying on antidepressants, and about a third of all the patients followed for that year had TMS reintroduced. Ketamine's benefit fades without maintenance for many people. Over a multi-year horizon, that changes both the cost and the logistics.
- Side-effect profile: TMS has no dissociation, no blood-pressure effects, no driving restriction, and no misuse potential. That matters if you have cardiovascular concerns, a substance-use history, or simply don't want a dissociative experience. Ketamine's profile is covered on our safety page.
How people choose between ketamine and TMS
In practice, constraints usually make this decision, and that is fine. If your insurance covers TMS and won't touch ketamine, a covered treatment you can complete beats an uncovered one you'll abandon halfway for cost. If you can't take four to six weeks of daily appointments, ketamine's schedule is more forgiving. If you've already done one without benefit, trying the other is a reasonable next step. They work by different mechanisms, and little research has tested whether not responding to one predicts the other, so ask the prescriber. And if suicidal thinking is part of the picture, tell the evaluating clinician directly. Esketamine is FDA-approved, alongside an oral antidepressant, to treat depressive symptoms in adults with major depression who have acute suicidal thoughts or behavior. Its label says it has not been shown to prevent suicide or reduce suicidal thoughts, and it does not replace hospital care when that is needed. Our conditions page explains what its label says about suicidal thinking.
Whichever direction you lean, ask the same questions of any program: how do you measure response, when do we reassess, and what happens if this doesn't work? The quality signals are the same across modalities, and our clinic guide lists them.
Can you combine ketamine and TMS?
Some people ask about getting both at once. The research on this is early and thin. A 2024 systematic review searched for studies from 2014 to 2024 and found only six. Three were case reports. The others were one retrospective study, one pilot study, and one review.
In those studies, people with treatment-resistant depression improved, and side effects were mostly mild and short-lived. The authors reported better results than either treatment alone. They cautioned that the studies were small and used very different designs, and they called for larger randomized trials. Half the evidence being case reports is another reason to read that result cautiously.
A 2023 review took a different angle. It looked at how the two treatments might work together in the brain. It did not test the combination in patients. It said recent studies suggest the pair may give stronger and longer-lasting results, and it aimed to lay groundwork for future treatment plans. That is a hypothesis for researchers to test. If you want to know whether combining them makes sense for you, ask your psychiatrist.
At a glance
- TMS: often insurance-covered, drug-free, 20–30 sessions over 4–6 weeks, gradual improvement, effects often hold for months.
- Ketamine: fast relief for responders, lighter schedule, but usually cash-pay, and many people need maintenance. Spravato splits the difference on coverage.
- Response rates look broadly similar across studies; head-to-head evidence is thin.
- If one didn't work, trying the other is a reasonable question for your prescriber.
- Coverage, schedule, urgency, and medical history decide this more often than preference.
Sources
- DailyMed (NLM) — Ketalar (ketamine hydrochloride) injection prescribing information, revised March 2026 — no driving for 24 hours after ketamine
- FDA, Drugs@FDA: Ketalar (ketamine hydrochloride), NDA 016812, approved 1970 — FDA-approved as an anesthetic; depression use is off-label — FDA
- Carpenter et al., "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) for Major Depression: A Multisite, Naturalistic, Observational Study of Acute Treatment Outcomes in Clinical Practice," Depression and Anxiety (2012) — PubMed
- Dunner et al., "A Multisite, Naturalistic, Observational Study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Patients With Pharmacoresistant Major Depressive Disorder: Durability of Benefit Over a 1-Year Follow-Up Period," Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (2014) — PubMed
- Taylor et al., "Seizure Risk With Repetitive TMS: Survey Results From Over a Half-Million Treatment Sessions," Brain Stimulation (2021) — PubMed
- Kaster et al., "Efficacy of Intranasal Esketamine versus rTMS for Treatment-Resistant Depression: Analysis of Individual Participant Data from Two Clinical Trials," eClinicalMedicine (2025) — esketamine vs. rTMS individual-participant analysis — PubMed
- National Institute of Mental Health — Brain Stimulation Therapies
- Murrough et al., "Antidepressant Efficacy of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Two-Site Randomized Controlled Trial," American Journal of Psychiatry (2013) — 0.5 mg/kg infused over 40 minutes — PubMed
- McInnes et al., "A Retrospective Analysis of Ketamine Intravenous Therapy for Depression in Real-World Care Settings," Journal of Affective Disorders (2022) — typical U.S. IV induction series — PubMed
- Arubuolawe et al., "Combination of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review," Cureus (2024) — systematic review of combined TMS and ketamine (six small studies) — PubMed
- Dębowska et al., "Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Ketamine: Implications for Combined Treatment in Depression," Frontiers in Neuroscience (2023) — review of possible mechanisms for combined treatment — PubMed
- Spravato® (esketamine) Full Prescribing Information — indications including depressive symptoms with acute suicidal ideation (PDF)